APCs vary by journal. Many journals offer APC discounts to society members or for manuscript transfers. The single highest discount applies discounts are exclusive of each other and cannot be accumulated. To qualify for the society member discount the corresponding author must be a member in good standing and must obtain further discount information through the relevant society website.Calorx teachers university wes
Authors should submit a waiver or discount request during the submission of their article. When submitting an article to a Wiley Open Access journal, the submitting author must agree to pay the publication charge minus any eligible discount or request a waiver.
After acceptance the article will enter the production cycle and the author will be asked to pay the publication charge for the journal minus any eligible discount.
When final formatting corrections are made and the author approves their article for publication, payment of the publication charge must be received before the article will be published online.
Payment can be made by any of the following methods: Credit card payment can be made online using a secure payment form. Cheque, purchase order, or institutional invoice payment is due within 30 days. Prompt payment is advised, as the article will not be published until payment is received.
GST and HST will be applied on digital publishing services supplied to Canadian customers at the applicable rate depending on the province.Skip to main content. USCIS is funded largely by application and petition fees. Recognizing that some applicants cannot pay the filing fees, USCIS established a fee waiver process for certain forms and benefit types.
We will approve a fee waiver only if you clearly demonstrate that you are unable to pay the filing fees. USCIS carefully considers the merits of each fee waiver request before making a decision. Note: If you are requesting a fee waiver, you cannot submit any petition or application online.
You will need to file paper versions of the fee waiver request and the form for which you are requesting a fee waiver.
If you have children under the age of 21 who receive means-tested benefits and want to file together. If you have a child 21 years of age or older who is going to college and is dependent on your household. Computer printouts are acceptable as long as they include the required information. This evidence should be in the form of a letter, notice, or other official document that contains the required information including:.
If your document does not show an expiration date for the means-tested benefit you currently receive. Benefit cards by themselves are not acceptable evidence of a means-tested benefit, unless they contain your name, the name of the agency granting you the public benefit, the type of benefit, and an indication that you currently receive the benefit for example, the date you were granted the benefit and the date it expires or was renewed.
States usually do not require applicants to return cards, without any value, after the expiration of benefits. My relative or roommate lives with me, does their income count toward my household income? I receive child support, but not the full amount as listed in the court order.
Do I include the full amount of the child support as additional income or financial support or only what I actually receive? Forms Form I, Request for Fee Waiver Form IP, HHS Poverty Guidelines for Fee Waiver Requests Find on this page Eligibility Requesting a fee waiver How to show that you receive a means-tested benefit How to show that your household income is at or below percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines How to show that you have a financial hardship Determining who counts towards your household size and income How marital separation affects eligibility How an Affidavit of Support affects eligibility How requesting a fee waiver affects your current immigration status Common reasons why we deny fee waiver requests Eligibility You can request a fee waiver if: The form you are filing is eligible for a fee waiver See the list available on the Form I, Request for Fee Waiver web page or the regulations at 8 CFR Your household income is at or below percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines at the time you file.
You are currently experiencing financial hardship that prevents you from paying the filing fee, including unexpected medical bills or emergencies. Instead of the form, we will also accept a letter with all the necessary information that states your request for a fee waiver, is signed by everyone requesting the fee waiver, and includes all the necessary supporting evidence. If you do not provide enough information and documents to support your request, there will be a considerable delay in processing your request.
Please read the form instructions carefully to avoid common mistakes.
Select at least one basis for which you may qualify and complete the relevant sections as instructed in the form and provide supporting documentation for any basis you select. If you choose, you may select more than one basis; you must provide supporting documentation for each basis you want considered.
You are not required to select more than one basis or complete all sections of the form. The translator must sign a certification that the English language translation is complete and accurate, and that he or she is competent to translate from the foreign language into English. USCIS does not regulate who may translate and does not require professional translation of documents. Sign your fee waiver request. Each person requesting a fee waiver must sign the fee waiver request.
If you are under 14 years of age, your parent or legal guardian may sign the request for you. A legal guardian may also sign for a person with a physical disability or mental impairment. Send your fee waiver request with the petition or application for which you are requesting the fee be waived.
Do not send a fee waiver request by itself. How to show that you receive a means-tested benefit A means-tested benefit is a public benefit where the agency granting the benefit considers your income and resources. Means-tested benefits may be federally, state, or locally funded.Public library of Science plos fee waivers.
I have been very grateful for this support. Unfortunately times have changed. Previously you simply had to assert that you did not have the funds to pay the publication charge and you were granted waiver. Why am I publishing it anyway? Is it to advance science or simply the careers of me and my co-authors?
This policy, of expecting an author to pay, seems contrary to the original PLoS One policy of publishing all science and could distort the science that is being published. You indicated that you will be sending supporting financial documentation with your application.
We have not yet received these supporting documents. Examples include grant award with budget information, signed letterhead from your institutional official with funding and budget details, expired grant award information, personal financial statements or other financial documentations that support your financial hardship explanations.
Please send them as soon as possible so we can append them to your application. Should we receive insufficient evidence to verify demonstrated financial hardship, we will not be able to approve your PFA application. I'm not sure what form this supporting information should take, given that I have no grants. The last time I was funded by a grant was Since then I have had two students funded by UK research councils and two Marie Curie fellows funded by the European Community, but I receive no funds outside those associated with these projects - the paper I have submitted to PLoS One was written with two undergraduate students.
The only evidence I can offer of this lack of grants is the lack of grant acknowledgements in papers I have published in the last few years. I fully appreciate that PLoS One needs money to function, and I am also very grateful for the complete and partial fee waivers that PLoS has given me in the past, but I simply have no funds.
We have received your signed self-attestation, but need additional supporting documentation to validate your financial hardship. Our former system of granting waivers has been replaced by a formal application process and we appreciate your assistance in demonstrating your financial hardship. Please provide supporting financial documents e.
Please advise. Should we receive insufficient evidence to verify demonstrated financial hardship, we will not be able to approve the PFA assistance amount requested. We appreciate your assistance in demonstrating your financial need.
I cannot provide a grant statement for a grant that ended over 5 years ago; the university changed their accounting system and terminated grants were not transferred. Furthermore, neither this grant, nor any other grant I have ever had, would provide support for this project, which is unrelated to any of my former research except for one paper published by PLoS Biology, which was incidentally granted a full waiver. You suggest that I should provide details of my personal financial position and from this I presume from this that if I am judged to be personally wealthy enough, then I will be required to pay the publication fee.
Is this the case? Thank you for your message. Yes, we do require that you send financial documentation of your hardship. Publication Fee Assistance program launched in April and is a new financial assistance program that replaces our old system of granting waivers with a formal application. We appreciate your help in demonstrating your financial situation so that we can ensure the assistance is granted to authors with a demonstrated need.
Since my case seems to depend upon my own personal finances I was wondering if you could tell me how these are judged. How small does my bank balance have to be before I am judged to be personally unable to pay? I was also wondering whether these policies regarding fee waivers are being applied universally across all PLoS journals, or whether each journal has its won policies. We apply the same criteria for the PFA application across all journals. There is no minimum, however the purpose is for you to help us understand your financial hardship.
Others have shown documentation on what they are making payments towards which puts a strain on their personal budget.
Motivation: A total review time of 5. When the first round of edits are purely editorial, one might expect that the AE would make the call at that point rather than sending the manuscript out for a second round. When the second round of reviews consists of one review with comments that were addressed in under an hour by a find-and-replace and the addition of a single line to the text such that the manuscript was resubmitted within hours of receiving the "reviews", the AE should certainly make the call at that point.
When the third round of reviews consist of no comments, one might start to wonder about the purpose of the second and third rounds of review. Personally, I started wondering if our bacteria had evolved since the initial submission, and were no longer considered part of the genus.
The one positive was that the invoice arrived in my inbox days after acceptance. Incredibly efficient! Well done, PLoS One. Motivation: The reviewer commented that the results are over-interpreted and the conclusions are not supported by data. However, the reviewer didn't offer reason. Motivation: I submitted my manuscript and the initial process was very slow.
Eventually I received a rejection. However that decision was based on the comments from 1 reviewer and it was apparent that the paper was not read, nor were the comments about the content of the submission nor were the reasons for rejection, logical. Consequently I appealed the decision. That was a mistake because it took an additional 7 months to get a decision.
I would get periodic emails apologizing for the delays indicating that a decision would come soon. Eventually following numerous email exchanges, I demanded that a decision be made. A week later the paper was rejected based on the opinion of one reviewer.Liceo classico montalto m. “sportivo” (orientamento
Having published numerous papers over the years I was disappointed but can accept the decisions. However no paper should take 10 months from submission to final decision, and one would expect that if reviews come back that are poor themselves, an additional reviewer would be identified.Nice to see PLOS's stated mission in action: "to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication".
Post a Comment. Therefore, please find appended an invoice PAB for this article. Thank you for publishing with PLoS and congratulations on your upcoming publication! Greetings Dr.
Why I published in PLoS ONE. And why I probably won’t again for awhile.
Jan Jensen. Thank you for your message. Yes, we can work with you to extend a partial or full fee waiver depending on financial circumstances.Fiberglass sailboat mast
Can you please advise us to reason for your waiver? Looking forward. Author Billing Team. The grant supporting this work has expired while the mss was in review, a protracted process that started in early March, and involved waiting 4 month for the second round of reviews despite numerous inquiries to the editor! We will grant you a full fee waiver given your grant expiration. We appreciate you choosing to make science open by publishing with PLOS.
Dear Author. Invoice PAB has been cancelled. Thank you for publishing with PLOS. Labels: plos one. Newer Post Older Post Home. Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom.Visit our COVID page for links to emerging research, updates about our policies, and more resources related to the pandemic. View the page. PLOS offsets publication expenses — including the cost of peer review management, journal production, and online hosting and archiving — by charging an Article Processing Charge APCto authors, institutions or funders for each article published.
Publication fees vary by journal and are payable upon article acceptance. Fees are subject to change and charged at the applicable rates effective on your submission date. Learn more. There is growing momentum to encourage Open Access publishing through funding initiatives.
Globally, authors benefit from the increasing availability of institutional, government, and foundation Open Access funds. Many institutions already support their researchers by setting aside financial resources to either pay APCs directly or reimburse the author. Find out if your institution is part of our Institutional Account Program.
More and more funders are encouraging researchers to publish in Open Access journals where their work can be read, and shared by all. Contact your funder directly to find out if they allow fees to be included as line items on a grant or provide specific article processing grants.
Authors must apply for GPI funding at time of manuscript submission. Group 1 countries Group 2 countries. An author can apply for PFA when submitting an article for publication. A decision is usually sent to the author within 10 business days. PLOS considers applications on a case-by-case basis.
PLOS publication decisions are based solely on editorial criteria. Information about applications for fee assistance are not disclosed to journal editors or reviewers. Still have questions? Fee Assistance FAQs. Publication Fees PLOS offsets publication expenses — including the cost of peer review management, journal production, and online hosting and archiving — by charging an Article Processing Charge APCto authors, institutions or funders for each article published.
Group 1 Countries
Pay Invoice. Institutional Open Access Funds Many institutions already support their researchers by setting aside financial resources to either pay APCs directly or reimburse the author.Return observable from subscribe
View List of Participating Institutions. Funder Fee Support More and more funders are encouraging researchers to publish in Open Access journals where their work can be read, and shared by all. Learn More. We believe that lack of funds should not be a barrier to Open Access publication. Since our founding, PLOS has provided publication fee support to authors. Authors should exhaust all alternative funding sources before applying for PFA. Funding disclosure information provided by authors will be used as part of the PFA application review.
Assistance must be formally applied for at submission. Requests made during the review process or after acceptance will not be considered.Should We Keep Riding Through the Coronavirus Pandemic? The Science
Authors cannot apply for the fee assistance by email or through direct request to journal editors.I've now heard from several tenured or near-tenure profs that publishing in plosone was career suicide. Thanks a lot Open Access. Perlstein eperlste January 21, Needless to say, my motivation for finishing the revisions waned. These people value science for science, and not where it happens to be published. DistribEcology I can't say you're wrong, but Where is the wrong measure of paper and slows down science.
Some of us like plosone on a CV. The answer is actually relatively simple. I thought it would be the best venue for my paper. The best place to get it read by the people I wanted to read it. My paper is about general models of allometric scaling how organism properties and processes, like metabolism change with size, and how we should view these in really variable ecosystems like savannas.
I think allometric scaling is pretty cool because it is one of the few things in ecology that appears to be somewhat universal across diverse taxa. As such, several general models have been developed often based on physical first principles and assumptions regarding natural selection that make testable predictions for how organisms trees in my case should vary with size. Instead, it is more likely the theory is incomplete, and necessarily so since it is attempting to be general.Ae2 stuff
So, I submitted the paper to Ecology. And waited.Corsair rm750 amazon
For over three months. Until the decision finally came from the editor: rejected. Absolutely rejected. No major reviews and then resubmit. It was pretty clear they did not want my paper. But, I then had to decide where to submit next.
After taking care of the technical issues brought up in the Ecology reviews, my co-authors and I started discussing where to submit next. We started thinking about the next tier of ecology journals things like Functional Ecologybut none seemed to provide the right fit.
Even though it would have been a great fit content-wise, I wanted a more diverse audience.
- 1963 thunderbird interior kit
- Free bitcoin app download
- Daballii mindaa bara 2012
- Darasa la nne hesabu
- Razer gold
- Imagine you were approached by a time traveler
- Gangnam style paprika
- What is a dreamer
- Web girospinea inv 2020
- 4 agm24004 agama shock dust boot set
- Gambar luka lecet jatuh dari motor
- Day party la
- Cat 1 imatch
- Flock of birds dream meaning
- Download manual de metrados y presupuestos capeco
- Nyk hinode